a serious ethical dilemma
Nov. 11th, 2003 09:41 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
i heard back from Time Warner investor relations. they say that only the brokerage can say whether the shares are really mine or not. i went back to etrade (which used to handle options for netscape/aol) and checked my previous transactions, and it doesn't say whether there were more shares i didn't sell, it just tells me how many i sold. it's possible, i suppose, that i made some sort of mistake at the time, or for that matter that etrade made some sort of mistake. another call to EquiServe says that yes, they really are mine, that i received them as part of the AOL/Time Warner merger.
here's the thing: i left Netscape in November of 1999, and sold all my shares at that time. the merger took place in January of 2000. why would i have received shares (and not options -- shares!) after i left the company? the only explanation i can think of at this point is that the shares were issued in error at that time, and have been sitting in a brokerage firm under my name ever since. i was notified this past week because the shares were converted from AOL to Time Warner under the terms of their new agreement, whatever the hell that is.
does that make them legally mine? i don't know. but everybody seems to believe they're mine, except for me. since the company has gone through so many changes and the brokerage has also changed since the time the shares were issued, no one seems to have any records that say they're not mine.
i don't know what to do.
here's the thing: i left Netscape in November of 1999, and sold all my shares at that time. the merger took place in January of 2000. why would i have received shares (and not options -- shares!) after i left the company? the only explanation i can think of at this point is that the shares were issued in error at that time, and have been sitting in a brokerage firm under my name ever since. i was notified this past week because the shares were converted from AOL to Time Warner under the terms of their new agreement, whatever the hell that is.
does that make them legally mine? i don't know. but everybody seems to believe they're mine, except for me. since the company has gone through so many changes and the brokerage has also changed since the time the shares were issued, no one seems to have any records that say they're not mine.
i don't know what to do.
no subject
Date: 2003-11-11 10:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-11 10:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-11 10:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-11 12:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-11 12:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-11 10:30 am (UTC)btw, did you have stock option you didn't convert when you went away? Sometimes there are corporate rules that if the management of a company changes hands (like Netscape's did), all outstanding options getting converted to stock. Again, in most companies, even though you left, your stock options are usually still valid for 90 days, waiting for you to buy them or surrender them. This would have covered the December purchase. Maybe they _are_ yours.
Better than a rock.
no subject
Date: 2003-11-11 10:38 am (UTC)this is where i'm getting hung up. i have a pretty strong sense of ethics, and it's incredibly difficult for me to consider taking something i don't believe is mine. but as you say, the company thinks they are mine -- and the value of the shares (currently around $3700) is meaningless to a company as big as time warner, but absolutely huge to me, especially at this particular time. so i'm wrestling with my sense that it would be wrong to sell them.
i am as certain as i can be that i did exercise and sell all my shares before i left -- but it's been 4 years. i've looked through all my paperwork, and looked at etrade, and as far as i can tell, i did sell everything i had.
anyway, either i made a mistake or they did.
no subject
Date: 2003-11-11 10:49 am (UTC)A possible reason?
Date: 2003-11-11 10:58 am (UTC)If the AOL-TW merger had such an arrangement, and the critical date for calculating entitlements was before you sold those shares, it wouldn't matter that you sold the original shares before the date of the merger. If something like this happened, those shares are yours by right.
Good luck.
no subject
Date: 2003-11-11 12:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-12 12:23 am (UTC)If you want me to ask those guys, just send me an email with the timeline of when you sold out and how much, as best you recall, as well as what they are telling you now.
no subject
Date: 2003-11-12 06:12 pm (UTC)But yes, I would take them.